Abstract: Mangrove ecosystems are increasingly threatened by climate-related stressors such as sea-level rise, altered salinity regimes, and intensified storm events. These pressures are compounded by local anthropogenic activities, placing the unique ecosystems like Setiu Wetlands on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia at a high risk. As local communities depend on these ecosystems for fisheries and small-scale tourism, incorporating their knowledge and experiences is essential for effective and culturally grounded management. This study employed Q-methodology, a semi-qualitative analysis to examine socioecological perspectives of the local stakeholders, including fishers, gleaners, tourism operators, conservation practitioners, and residents. Two distinct discourses were identified: (1) Community-Centric Environmental Stewardship, emphasizing livelihood dependence, traditional practices, and the need for fair access to mangrove resources; and (2) Ecological Protection with Regulated Use, prioritizing stricter conservation measures, habitat recovery, and long-term ecosystem stability. Despite these differences, respondents shared strong opposition to destructive practices such as mangrove clearing and bivalve dredging, and recognized the value of tourism when managed sustainably and inclusively. These shared values highlight opportunities for two-way science—co-production of knowledge where local experience guides ecological research, and scientific evidence strengthens community-led decision-making. Overall, the findings underscore the socioecological complexity of the Setiu Wetlands and the importance of integrating indigenous and local ecological knowledge (LEK) into climate adaptation and conservation planning. Management approaches that acknowledge multiple viewpoints are more likely to strengthen community wellbeing, build trust, and enhance the long-term resilience of the vulnerable mangrove ecosystems.