Comparative Ethnoecological Knowledge of Farmers and Herders on Pests and Parasites in Central Europe
Tracks
Kuranda Ballroom
| Wednesday, July 29, 2026 |
| 1:30 PM - 1:45 PM |
Speaker
Dr Viktor Ulicsni
ELTE Research Centre For The Humanities
Comparative Ethnoecological Knowledge of Farmers and Herders on Pests and Parasites in Central Europe
ISE Congress 2026 Abstract
Understanding how small-scale rural communities perceive and manage invertebrate pests and parasites provides crucial insights for sustainable agro-ecological systems. This study compares the traditional ecological knowledge of Hungarian-speaking small-scale farmers and herders in two Central European regions regarding pest and parasite taxa affecting crops, livestock, and households. Forty informants were interviewed using photographs, semi-structured interviews, and picture sorting to document folk taxa, local names, salient features, uses, damage, attitudes, and associated proverbs.
Altogether, over 90% of recorded invertebrate folk taxa had distinct vernacular names, and 49% were known to at least half of the participants. Both groups displayed high ecological awareness, accurately linking species’ presence to habitat conditions and weather (e.g., liver fluke with wet pastures; slugs with rainfall). Farmers’ knowledge centred on soil- and crop-related pests (slugs, wireworms, flea beetles, caterpillars, stored-grain insects), while herders primarily focused on veterinary and zoonotic parasites (liver fluke, ticks, tapeworms, itch mites). Distinct yet complementary knowledge systems emerged: herders emphasized grazing avoidance, simple surgical operations, and topical home remedies for animal parasites, whereas farmers described hand-picking, baiting, burning, and using domestic fowl to control garden and field pests.
Shared features included strong pest–habitat reasoning, practical low-input management, and moral categorization of invertebrates as mainly harmful. However, both groups expressed selective tolerance toward culturally valued taxa such as edible snails and medicinal leeches. Proverbs and weather-linked sayings served as mnemonic tools for forecasting pest emergence and guiding management timing.
These findings highlight a complementary “pasture–field–household” continuum of ecological vigilance, where herders’ veterinary-parasitological and farmers’ agro-entomological expertise together form an integrated local biosecurity knowledge system. Recognizing such nuanced, practice-based ethnoecological knowledge can inform participatory pest management and strengthen agroecosystem resilience within traditional European rural landscapes.
Altogether, over 90% of recorded invertebrate folk taxa had distinct vernacular names, and 49% were known to at least half of the participants. Both groups displayed high ecological awareness, accurately linking species’ presence to habitat conditions and weather (e.g., liver fluke with wet pastures; slugs with rainfall). Farmers’ knowledge centred on soil- and crop-related pests (slugs, wireworms, flea beetles, caterpillars, stored-grain insects), while herders primarily focused on veterinary and zoonotic parasites (liver fluke, ticks, tapeworms, itch mites). Distinct yet complementary knowledge systems emerged: herders emphasized grazing avoidance, simple surgical operations, and topical home remedies for animal parasites, whereas farmers described hand-picking, baiting, burning, and using domestic fowl to control garden and field pests.
Shared features included strong pest–habitat reasoning, practical low-input management, and moral categorization of invertebrates as mainly harmful. However, both groups expressed selective tolerance toward culturally valued taxa such as edible snails and medicinal leeches. Proverbs and weather-linked sayings served as mnemonic tools for forecasting pest emergence and guiding management timing.
These findings highlight a complementary “pasture–field–household” continuum of ecological vigilance, where herders’ veterinary-parasitological and farmers’ agro-entomological expertise together form an integrated local biosecurity knowledge system. Recognizing such nuanced, practice-based ethnoecological knowledge can inform participatory pest management and strengthen agroecosystem resilience within traditional European rural landscapes.
Biography
Viktor Ulicsni is an ethnobiologist at the Institute of Ethnology, ELTE Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungary. His research focuses on traditional ecological knowledge, ethnozoology, and the integration of conservation and cultural knowledge in the Carpathian Basin. He works on documenting human–animal relationships and promoting interdisciplinary approaches to biodiversity and cultural heritage studies.